The Risks of Insecure Communication in National Security
- Brainz Magazine
- Apr 4
- 4 min read
Written by Karl A. Cassell, Executive Leader
Karl Cassell is a passionate advocate for systemic change. He combines his expertise in leadership, entrepreneurship, and spiritual matters to inspire meaningful action on critical social issues such as poverty, education, and racial equity.
In an era where cyber threats loom large, the recent text exchange between an American national security team on an unsecured application raises serious concerns about the safety of sensitive government communications. The exchange, reportedly conducted on a platform vulnerable to cyberattacks, highlights glaring lapses in cybersecurity protocols. National security officials are entrusted with protecting classified information, and any breach, even one as seemingly mundane as an unsecured text exchange, could have catastrophic consequences. This type of communication failure, if replicated in a business environment, would likely result in swift and severe consequences, including disciplinary action, financial penalties, and reputational damage.
The national security implications
When national security officials engage in communication, they handle classified and sensitive information that, if exposed, could threaten both domestic and international stability. The use of unsecured applications for such exchanges creates multiple risks:
Foreign espionage
Adversaries like China, Russia, and other state-sponsored actors actively seek opportunities to intercept sensitive U.S. communications. Using an unencrypted or weakly secured app increases the likelihood of intelligence leaks.
Cyber vulnerabilities
Government agencies spend billions on cybersecurity infrastructure to protect data from breaches. However, all these efforts can be rendered useless if officials choose convenience over security by using personal devices or unsecured apps for official communication.
Compromised decision-making
National security decisions often require real-time discussion, but if adversaries gain access to these communications, they could manipulate or disrupt operations, compromising national safety.
Insecure communication in government settings can have lasting consequences. In past cases, such as the infamous 2015 Office of Personnel Management (OPM) hack, sensitive personnel data was stolen by foreign actors, leading to serious security risks. If an unsecured text exchange contained classified discussions about military movements, intelligence operations, or counterterrorism strategies, it could severely undermine U.S. strategic interests.
What if this happened in business?
If a similar situation occurred in the business world, the response would be immediate and severe. In the corporate sector, information security is critical, particularly for industries handling financial transactions, customer data, intellectual property, or proprietary strategies. Companies invest heavily in secure communication tools such as encrypted emails, enterprise messaging platforms, and VPNs to safeguard their operations. The repercussions of using an insecure app in a business setting would be swift and damaging:
Legal and regulatory consequences
Companies are bound by laws such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which require the strict handling of sensitive information. A failure to protect communications could lead to legal liabilities, regulatory fines, or even criminal charges.
Financial losses
A data breach stemming from unsecured communication could expose trade secrets or client data, leading to loss of competitive advantage, lawsuits, and stock price declines. Major breaches, such as the 2017 Equifax breach, have cost companies billions in settlements and lost business.
Reputational damage
Trust is a crucial factor in business. If customers or stakeholders find out that a company mishandled sensitive information, it could lead to a loss of consumer confidence, partnerships, and market credibility. Businesses that fail to protect sensitive data often struggle to recover from the reputational fallout.
Employee termination and organizational overhaul
Unlike government agencies, where personnel may avoid immediate accountability due to bureaucratic protections, businesses tend to act swiftly. Employees responsible for security breaches may be fired, entire IT policies may be rewritten, and training programs may be mandated to prevent future incidents.
Lessons to be learned
The national security text exchange incident offers valuable lessons for both government and business sectors:
Security over convenience
Whether in government or business, employees must prioritize secure communication methods, even if they are less convenient than personal apps or unsecured networks.
Mandatory cybersecurity training
Both public and private organizations should enforce regular training to educate personnel on the risks of unsecured communication and the latest cyber threats.
Strict compliance and oversight
Governments should mirror corporate best practices by enforcing strict compliance policies, increasing oversight on how officials communicate, and implementing penalties for security lapses.
Investment in secure infrastructure
Just as businesses invest in robust cybersecurity tools, government agencies must continue upgrading their secure communication systems and ensuring they are widely adopted by personnel.
In conclusion, the recent text exchange on an insecure app by an American national security team underscores a critical weakness in information security protocols. The incident demonstrates how a single lapse in judgment can expose vital communications to adversarial threats, putting national security at risk. If such an event occurred in the business world, it would likely lead to regulatory scrutiny, financial repercussions, and personnel consequences. Both government and private sectors must learn from this mistake by reinforcing cybersecurity policies, mandating secure communication channels, and prioritizing security over convenience. The integrity of national security, like corporate success, depends on the ability to protect sensitive information from prying eyes.
Read more from Karl A. Cassell
Karl A. Cassell, Executive Leader
Grounded in faith, Karl Cassell is a seasoned executive leader with over 20 years of experience in nonprofit and government sectors, focusing on social justice, poverty alleviation, education, and racial equity. As an entrepreneur, published writer, and public speaker, Karl advocates for systemic change and works to build sustainable solutions through collaboration with governments, organizations, and businesses to create economic opportunity and social inclusion.
