Written by Martina Magnery, Relationship Coach & CEO
Martina Magnery is a Psychotherapist, Relationship Coach, and the visionary CEO of Clarityfor, a leading Personal Development Coaching Company. At Clarityfor, Martina and her team provide evidence-based approaches to help individuals achieve transformative and measurable personal growth.
Micro-traumas are subtle emotional wounds that may not seem significant individually but can accumulate and weaken the foundation of a relationship. Unlike major betrayals, these small moments of neglect or dismissal often go unnoticed, yet they profoundly shape how partners feel about each other. No one is guilt-free when it comes to inflicting these psychological injuries. These wounds frequently appear as interruptions, dismissiveness, or belittling remarks that create emotional distance over time.
Subtle forms of emotional disregard
One of the most common ways micro-traumas manifest is through dismissive communication. When a partner regularly interrupts, minimizes feelings, or deflects serious discussions, it can leave the other feeling unheard and undervalued. Over time, these patterns create resentment, making emotional connection harder to sustain. Examples include:
Interrupting mid-sentence: Cutting someone off before they finish expressing their feelings.
Minimizing emotions: Saying things like, “You’re overreacting” or “It’s not a big deal.”
Deflecting the topic: Changing the subject or making a joke to avoid discussing an issue.
Gaslighting: Denying events happened or making a partner feel as though they are imagining things.
Ignoring or walking away: Physically disengaging from conversations without acknowledgment.
Dismissing needs or boundaries: Ignoring a partner’s expressed needs and continuing behaviors that upset them.
Undermining a partner’s perspective: Saying things like, “You don’t know what you’re talking about” or “You’re being dramatic.”
Overcoming micro-traumas and strengthening relationships
To break these patterns, partners must become aware of how these small moments add up. Healing starts with active listening, where both individuals feel seen and heard without interruption or dismissal. Practicing thoughtful communication and acknowledging emotions instead of invalidating them fosters trust and emotional safety. Additionally, therapeutic approaches like EMDR can help process past emotional wounds and prevent ongoing relational harm.
Addressing micro-traumas isn’t about assigning blame but about creating an environment where both partners feel valued and respected, ultimately strengthening their emotional connection.
How micro-traumas affect a relationship
Without addressing these wounds, couples often find themselves trapped in patterns like:
Emotional distance: Feeling less connected, less affectionate, and more like roommates than lovers.
Triggered reactions: Small disagreements escalate because they touch deeper, unresolved pain.
Past wounds resurfacing: Childhood or past relationship wounds get reactivated, leading to misinterpretations and defensiveness.
A powerful method for healing micro-traumas: EMDR and relationship repair
One of the most effective ways to heal emotional wounds, big or small, is Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), a trauma-informed therapy that helps the brain reprocess painful memories.
How EMDR supports relationship healing
Rewires emotional triggers: Helps partners stop reacting from past pain and approach conflicts with clarity and compassion.
Shifts negative beliefs: Transforms internalized thoughts like “I’m not valued” into “My needs matter.”
Restores secure attachment: Strengthens the bond of safety and trust, making partners feel emotionally held.
“EMDR isn’t just for big traumas. It helps process emotional wounds, big and small, so they no longer dictate how we show up in our relationships.”
Clinical research suggests EMDR can create lasting change, reducing emotional distress and helping couples rewire painful relational patterns.
The relationship safety system (RSS): A framework for lasting connection
During our personalized couple retreats, couples don’t just heal, they learn a system to keep their relationship safe long after the retreat ends.
1. The safety check-in: A weekly ritual to strengthen trust
What it is: A dedicated 15–30-minute ritual where partners share concerns and emotions without judgment or interruptions.
Why it works:
Builds emotional availability
Reduces relationship anxiety
Helps partners feel seen and heard
2. The conflict reset button: Preventing emotional escalation
What it is: A mutually agreed-upon signal (word or gesture) to pause an argument before it escalates.
Why it works:
Prevents fight-or-flight reactions
Allows emotional regulation before re-engaging
Reduces damage from reactive conflicts
3. The relationship vision statement: Aligning goals and values
What it is: A simple, written statement of shared relationship goals to serve as a North Star for decisions and behaviors.
Why it works:
Creates shared meaning
Prevents resentment from misaligned expectations
Strengthens commitment to a unified future
Micro-traumas don’t have to define your relationship. With the right tools and healing strategies, you can transform your relationship into a secure, loving partnership.
Join our upcoming bespoke couples therapy retreats and experience a guided system for healing and deepening connection at Clarityfor.
Read more from Martina Magnery
Martina Magnery, Relationship Coach & CEO
Martina Magnery is a Psychotherapist, Relationship Coach, and the visionary CEO of Clarityfor, a Personal Development Coaching Company. At Clarityfor, Martina and her team offer evidence-based approaches to help individuals achieve transformative and measurable personal growth. Beyond her role as a coach and CEO, Martina also shares her expertise as the host of the Clarityfor People podcast, where she delves into the art of personal development and relationship dynamics with insight and passion.A., & de Jongh, A. (2017). Intensive EMDR and the Fear of Being Unloved: A Case Study. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 11(2), 84-95. doi:10.1891/1933-3196.11.2.84
